Does the UFC disrespect Ortiz? Tito makes his argument...

by Leland Roling 5/20/2008 4:38:00 AM
Slam Canoe CA

Sherdog.com's Greg Savage sat down with Tito Ortiz for an interview that has some great insight into the mindset of Ortiz as he steps into the Octagon for his last fight for the UFC this weekend against Lyoto Machida. Savage asked Ortiz during the interview to tell the camera a few good things that Dana White has done for him and the sport in the past. The answers were very interesting and should give fans a look at what the beef is between Ortiz and the UFC. Check it out here, props to Greg Savage.

Ortiz talks about Dana White's tenacity as a manager and as a businessman and how the two occupations differed in many ways. He stated that he loved having White on his side when negotiating contracts, but he became a monster once he took over the UFC with the Fertitta's. He mentions the evidence of Dana White's obsession with becoming a superstar. Namely, he talked about Dana White being focused on heavily in the Ultimate Fighter reality series.

One of the more intriguing ideas Ortiz threw around were once again the figures. He talked about the million dollar deals that the UFC has been pushing, and the fighters aren't seeing any of the benefits. He named off the SpikeTV $100 million dollar deal as a basis for one of his arguments.

The lowdown

Ortiz actually makes some solid points. Although his numbers aren't accurate, the machine that is the UFC remains the biggest money making venture in MMA today. In fact, they make much more than any other promotion in the game right now. With many of the North American promotions failing, the UFC stands to make even more money through sponsorships, events, and exploring new markets. Add in the fact that MMA is pushing to be sanctioned in new states, the UFC could make a killing in some of the larger markets such as New York City.

So, does Tito have a point? Should the fighters be making more money? Of course they should! Although the pay has steadily increased a bit, the UFC still makes much more than the total fight purses at each event. The one underlying factor that we don't know is the percentage of cuts they must give to PPV providers, PPV revenue agreements in contracts to fighters, and production costs.

Has the UFC shit all over Tito Ortiz? In my mind, it's hard to really say without accurate numbers, but Tito Ortiz did manage to help make the UFC relevant throughout it's infancy. The problem for Ortiz is that today is what gets you the big money, and today... he isn't the world championship caliber fighter that he once was. A big win for Ortiz on Saturday could very well put him back into that class though, so this could be a do-or-die fight for his career to take back off again.

Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Dana White | Tito Ortiz | UFC 84



Related posts

Comments

May 20. 2008 13:05

Personally, I don't buy much of what Tito says. The only time he pushes for more pay for fighters is when...he is negotiating a contract.

Dave Meltzer recently pointed out that Tito's weakest paycheck was between 700-800k for the Evans fight. It did a poor buyrate so Tito made less.

He recently said the UFC pays only 5%, but that number is easly proven wrong. The average payroll for a UFC event is between 10-20% of the revenue.

He complained that fighters are not getting money for the DVDs and video games. While I agree they should get money for the DVDs, THERE IS NOT GAME OUT. So it Tito guessing?

Dana and co should pay more and hopefully will continue to increase the payroll as time goes on. In a Starnes recent tirade, he admited to picking up a 25K bonus on top of his fight of the night bonus for the fight against Leben. Most regular UFC fighters do ok for themselves.

DVDs should be bringing in revenue for the fighters. If this is not happening, I pray it changes soon.

But Tito's history of full of lies and excuses. He has twice, in the last couple of years, accused his opponents of greasing, he has blamed the refs for his losses as well as his constant injuries.

He has blamed Dana for him leaving, yet it was Lorenzo that handled all of the business with Tito. Is he saying that Lornezo, a senior owner, is simply a pupper for Dana?

He said the sparring bout was never for charity, but the same time he said it, his website actually said it WAS FOR charity.

Too many lies for me to believe much of what he says.

Tim Sylvia managed to walk away from the UFC with his head held high with dignity and class...too bad Tito can't do the same.

Jeremy us

May 20. 2008 16:56

LMAO that Tito said if this was the old days when he was rolling with the gangs, he would've shanked Dana White along time ago.

Ultimate Mind us

Add comment


 

  Country flag

[b][/b] - [i][/i] - [u][/u]- [quote][/quote]



Live preview

September 8. 2008 00:42


Our Writers

  • Leland Roling - Editor
  • Joe Schmitt - Staff Writer
  • John McKiernan - Staff Writer
  • Matthew Watt - Staff Writer